Investigation of Products Based on Different Writing Speeds using 3D Printer (Extruder)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/actanatsci.2023.354.7Keywords:
3D Printers, PLA, Writing SpeedAbstract
In this study, the results of products depending on the printing speed of the 3D printer are discussed. The data was compared to the standard averages (SA) of products produced at different production speeds. The highest standard deviation is observed at a production speed of 100 mm.s-1. In terms of product length (L), the highest deviation is at 40 mm.s-1, while the lowest is at 60 mm.s-1. The product closest to the desired 20 mm length was appeared at a speed of 60 mm.s-1. For product height (H), the highest deviation is at 40 mm.s-1, while the lowest is at 80 mm.s-1. The product closest to the desired 1 mm height is at a speed of 80 mm.s-1. Regarding product weight, the highest deviation is at 40 mm.s-1, and the lowest is at
100 mm.s-1. The results provide further details on the standard averages and standard deviations for each product at each production speed. The deviation percentage (PD) and the H/L ratio were also calculated to understand the magnitude of variation in the products. The H/L ratio was calculated to provide insight into the difference between the highest and lowest measurement results of the produced products. The results show that the highest differences among the products in terms of length, height, and weight are observed at a production speed of 100 mm.s-1. Consequently, it was concluded that a production speed of 100 mm.s-1 resulted in the most significant variations in length, height, and weight between the products.
References
Akbaba, A. İ., & Akbulut, E. (2021). 3 boyutlu yazıcılar ve kullanım alanları [3D printers and areas of usage]. ETÜ Sentez İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3, 19-46. https://doi.org/10.47358/sentez.2020.13
Anderson, I. (2017). Mechanical properties of specimens 3D printed with virgin and recycled polylactic acid. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 4(2), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2016.0054
Dou, H., Cheng, Y., Ye, W., Zhang, D., Li, J., Miao, Z., & Rudykh, S. (2020). Effect of process parameters on tensile mechanical properties of 3D printing continuous carbon fiber-reinforced PLA composites. Materials, 13(17), 3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173850
Kalsoom, U., Nesterenko, P. N., & Paull, B. (2016). Recent developments in 3D printable composite materials. RSC Advances, 6, 60355-60371. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA11334F
Kamer, M. S., Temiz, S., Yaykasli, H., Kaya, A., & Akay, O. E. (2022). Effect of printing speed on FDM 3D-printed PLA samples produced using different two printers. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 6(3), 438-448. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1088805
Khosravani, M. R., Berto, F., Ayatollahi, & Reinicke, T. (2022). Characterization of 3D-printed PLA parts with different raster orientations and printing speeds. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05005-4
Kroll, E., & Artzi, D. (2011). Enhancing aerospace engineering students’ learning with 3D printing wind-tunnel models. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 17(5), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111156522
Ming, Y., Zhang, S., Han, W., Wang, B., Duan, Y., & Xiao, H. (2020). Investigation on process parameters of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermosetting epoxy composites. Additive Manufacturing, 33, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101184
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature Biotechnology, 32, 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications, and challenges. Composite Part B: Engineering, 143, 172-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
O’Neill, B. (2022). 3D print speed: What it is and why it matters. Retrieved on October 18, 2023, from https://www.wevolver.com/article/3d-print-speed-what-it-is-and-why-it-matters
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018). FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review. Polymer Testing, 69, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020
Short, D. B. (2015). Use of 3D printing by museums: Educational exhibits, artifact education, and artifact restoration. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2(4), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0030
Franco-Urquiza, E. A., Escamilla, Y. R., Llanas, P. I. A. (2021). Characterization of 3D printing on jute fabrics. Polymers, 13(19), 3202. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193202
Yaman, U., Butt, N., Sacks, E., & Hoffmann, C. (2016). Slice coherence in a query-based architecture for 3D heterogeneous printing. Computer-Aided Design, 75-76, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2016.02.005
Yang, T. -C., & Yeh, C. -H. (2020). Morphology and mechanical properties of 3D printed wood fiber/polylactic acid composite parts using fused deposition modeling (FDM): The effects of printing speed. Polymers, 12(6), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061334
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bayram Kızılkaya, Hakan Ayyıldız
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
