Refining the Effective Atomic Number of Copper Compounds: A High-Precision Analysis via Rayleigh-to-Compton Scattering Intensity Ratios

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61326/jaasci.v5i1.483

Keywords:

Chemical environment, Copper compounds, Effective atomic number , HPGe detector, Rayleigh-to-Compton scattering

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive investigation into the effective atomic numbers ( ) and electron densities ( ) of various copper compounds using the Rayleigh-to-Compton ( ) scattering ratio method. Measurements were performed using a high-resolution HPGe detector and a 241  radioisotope source emitting 59.54 keV gamma rays. The experimental  ratios were utilized to derive  values, which were then compared with theoretical data obtained via WinXCOM. A significant correlation was observed between the chemical environment of the copper compounds and their scattering intensities. One of the main conclusions that can be drawn from the experimental results is how accurately the effective atomic number is determined using data obtained from coherent and Compton scattering. As proof of this, it is clearly seen that the Compton and coherent scattering data obtained from the copper sulfate and copper iodide samples examined during the experiment are highly sensitive to the effective atomic number of the sample used and have a significant effect on spectral analyses. In the experimental results, which also proved this situation experimentally, it is clearly seen that Compton scattering is dominant in samples with low effective atomic numbers, and conversely, coherent scattering becomes dominant in environments with high effective atomic numbers. Thus, our study, with its meaningful results obtained from theoretical calculations and experimental data, has proven that the effective atomic number can be determined in complex chemical structures using the R/C ratio, as we used in our experiments.

References

Cinan, E., & Yılmaz, D. (2021). Effective atomic numbers of boron compounds obtained using Rayleigh to compton scattering intensity ratio. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 174, 109753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109753

Demir, D., & Turşucu, A. (2013). Measurement of the effective atomic number of FexCr1− x and FexNix alloys using scattering of gamma rays. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 581, 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.057

Duvauchelle, P., Peix, G., & Babot, D. (1999). Effective atomic number in the Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 155(3), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00450-4

Edelstein, D., Heidenreich, J., Goldblatt, R., Cote, W., Uzoh, C. E., Lustig, N. E., Roper, P., McDevitt, T., Motsiff, W., Simon, A. H., Dukovic, J., Wachnik, R., Rathore, H., Schulz, R., Su, L., Luce, S., & Slattery, J. (1997). Full copper wiring in a sub-0.25 µm CMOS ULSI technology. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). Washington. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.1997.650496

Gerward, L., Guilbert, N., Jensen, K. B., & Levring, H. (2001). X-ray absorption in matter. Reengineering XCOM. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 60(1-2), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(00)00324-8

Han, I., & Demir, L. (2009). Mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic and electron numbers of Ti and Ni alloys. Radiation Measurements, 44(3), 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.010

Hine, G. J. (1952). The effective atomic numbers of materials for various gamma-ray interactions. Physical Review, 85(4), 725-725.

Hubbell, J. H. (1982). Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients. The International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 33(11), 1269-1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4

Jackson, D. F., & Hawkes, D. J. (1981). X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures. Physics Reports, 70(3), 169-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(81)90014-4

Jangir, H. K., Mandal, A., & Srinivasan, V. (2026). A parametric study on the dynamic behavior of closed-end floating pipe pile in cohesionless soil: Effect of diameter, stiffness, and interface characteristics under dynamic excitation. Ocean Engineering, 343, 123596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.123596

Knoll, G. F. (2010). Radiation detection and measurement. John & Wiley Sons Inc.

Kumar, S., Sharma, V., Mehta, D., & Singh, N. (2007). Rayleigh, Compton and K-shell radiative resonant Raman scattering in 83Bi for 88.034 keV γ-rays. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 264(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.07.021

Singh, B., Kumar, V., & Sidhu, G. S. (2010). Investigations of mass attenuation coefficients and energy absorption buildup factors of some low-Z gamma-ray shielding materials. International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, 2(5), 73-77.

Singh, M. P., Sharma, A., Singh, B., & Sandhu, B. S. (2010). Non-destructive evaluation of scientific and biological samples by scattering of 145 keV gamma rays. Radiation Measurements, 45(8), 960-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2010.01.021

Turhan, M. F., Akman, F., Polat, H., Kaçal, M. R., & Demirkol, İ. (2020). Gamma-ray attenuation behaviors of hematite doped polymer composites. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 129, 103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103504

Tursucu, A., Demir, D., & Onder, P. (2013). Effective atomic number determination of rare earth oxides with scattering intensity ratio. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2013(1), 738978. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/738978

Turşucu, A., Elmahroug, Y., & Yılmaz, D. (2023). Radiation shielding calculations of some selected rare earth oxides. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 212, 111066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.111066

Zhong, J. X., Shih, J. Y., & Wang, F. K. (2023). Four-channel phase and quadrature self-injection-locked (PQSIL) radar for displacement monitoring using a modified principal component analysis (MPCA) method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 72(1), 822-835. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2023.3318851

Downloads

Published

28-06-2026

Issue

Section

Research Articles