Systematic Analysis of Studies on Professional Competencies, 21st Century Skills and Literacy Skills by Social Studies Teachers and Prospective Teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61326/bes.v4i1.369

Keywords:

21st century skills, Literacy skills, Social studies teacher, Systematic literature review, Teacher competencies

Abstract

Teacher competencies are defined as the knowledge, skills and attitudes required to fulfil the teaching profession effectively and efficiently. Teachers' possession of these basic competencies is seen as one of the key factors for increasing students' achievement and ensuring their personal development. In addition, to adapt to the changing conditions of the 21st century, several significant businesspeople, politicians and educational experts of the period have gathered and put forward studies on the skills that individuals should gain. In order to effectively implement these skills, it is of great importance that teachers have the appropriate competencies. The alignment of teacher competencies with the skills set forth in the P21 framework is necessary to increase the level of success in education. In recent years, literacy skills have gained importance and literacy fields have diversified. Due to this importance, many literacy skills have been included in curricula. In the acquisition of these skills by students, it is emphasized that teachers should have these skills first. From this point of view, this study aims to determine how the researches on social studies teacher competencies are distributed according to research approach, method, sample/study group, research year and type and in which competency area they are concentrated. In line with this purpose, it is thought that this study will provide a road map for future research on social studies teacher competencies, 21st century skills partnership framework and field literacy skills. In accordance with the purpose of the study, 190 studies that were reviewed in “YÖK Thesis” and “TR Index” databases, using 36 key concepts, and met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. According to the results of this research using the systematic literature review method, it was determined that the studies were mostly conducted by prospective social studies teachers, most of which were master's theses, that there was an increase in the number of studies after 2019, and that they were concentrated in the fields of content knowledge, field education knowledge, information and communication technologies literacy, and digital literacy.

References

Ayaz, M. F., & Oral, B., & Söylemez, M. (2015). Evaluation of the post-graduate theses on teacher education in Turkey. Elementary Education Online, 14(2), 787-802. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.89009

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 34(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175

Creswell, J.W. (2017). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş. Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)

Gençtürk Güven, E., & Karatekin, K. (2021). Sosyal bilgiler için çoklu okuryazarlıklar II. Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)

Gençtürk, E., & Karatekin, K. (2013). Sosyal bilgiler için çoklu okuryazarlıklar I. Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)

Gündoğdu, K., Aytaçlı, B., Aydoğan, R., & Yıldırım, H. (2015). Öğretmen yeterlikleri alanında yazılan makalelerin içerik analizi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 30-43. (In Turkish)

Karoğlu, A. K., Bal, K., & Çimşir, E. (2020). Toplum 5.0 sürecinde Türkiye’de eğitimde dijital dönüşüm. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.815428 (In Turkish)

Kaşkaya, A. (2012). Öğretmen yeterlikleri kapsamında yapılan araştırmaların konu amaç yöntem ve sonuçları açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(2), 789-805. (In Turkish)

Kazu, İ. Y., & Çam, H. (2019). Öğretmen yeterliği ve nitelikleri üzerine yapılmış lisansüstü çalışmaların incelenmesi: Bir içerik analizi çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(71), 1349-1367. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.516910 (In Turkish)

MoNE (Turkish Ministry of National Education). (2006). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri, öğretmen yetiştirme ve eğitimi genel müdürlüğü. MEB Yayınları. (In Turkish)

MoNE (Turkish Ministry of National Education). (2008). Öğretmenlik yeterlikleri, öğretmenlik mesleği genel ve özel alan yeterlikleri. MEB Yayınları. (In Turkish)

MoNE (Turkish Ministry of National Education). (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri, öğretmen yetiştirme ve geliştirme genel müdürlüğü. MEB Yayınları. (In Turkish)

MoNE (Turkish Ministry of National Education). (2023). Güçlü yarınlar için 2023 eğitim vizyonu. MEB Yayınları. (In Turkish)

MoNE (Turkish Ministry of National Education). (2024). Türkiye yüzyılı maarif modeli, öğretim programları okuryazarlığı öğretmen kılavuz kitabı. MEB Yayınları. (In Turkish)

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

P21. (2009). Partnership for 21st century skill-score content integration. https://www.marietta.edu/sites/default/files/documents/21st_century_skills_standards_book_2.pdf

Rotherham, A., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century skills: The challenges ahead. Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A, 67(1), 16-21.

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences. RAND Corporation.

Saykal, A., & Uluçınar Sağır, Ş. (2021). Türkiye’de öğretmen yeterlikleri ve teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi araştırmaları. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 115-137. (In Turkish)

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

T.C. Mesleki Yeterlilik Kurumu. (2015). Türkiye yeterlilikler çerçevesi. https://www.myk.gov.tr/tr/page/83 (In Turkish)

Tingil, B. A., Mutlu, G., & Pekkarakaş, E. (2023). 21. yüzyıl öğretmenlerinin bilgi ve yeterlik alanlarının belirlenmesi: Bir delphi çalışması. International Journal of Social Science Research, 12(2), 146-171. (In Turkish)

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık. (In Turkish)

Downloads

Published

29-06-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles