Knowledge Levels and Safety Culture of Science Center Instructors in Laboratories: An Analytical Study from Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61326/bes.v4i2.437Keywords:
Education, Laboratory practice, Laboratory safety, Science, Science center instructors, WorkshopAbstract
This study examines the laboratory safety culture levels of science center instructors in Türkiye by analyzing their knowledge, practices, and preparedness related to science laboratory activities. Using a qualitative single case study design, data were collected through pre-interviews, observations, and post-interviews with two science instructors who work at the science center. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, resulting in five main themes: general safety measures, educational level of the science center instructors, emergency planning, preparedness for potential incidents, and instructor roles. The findings show that instructors demonstrate strong awareness of basic safety procedures, including chemical handling, equipment control and classroom management during laboratory activities. Safety practices were effectively integrated into the teaching process before, during, and after experiments. However, the results also reveal significant limitations in terms of written safety guidelines, systematic emergency planning, and formal emergency training. Although instructors demonstrated proactive behavior and effective risk management during experimental applications, their preparedness for emergency situations—such as knowledge of emergency exits, fire equipment, and first aid materials—was insufficient. These findings highlight the need for structured safety training programs, improved emergency preparedness, and standardized safety protocols within science centers. The results are discussed in relation to existing research on science center instructors, emphasizing the importance of strengthening laboratory safety culture to enhance the quality and safety of science education in informal learning environments.
References
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
American Chemical Society. (2016a). Guidelines for chemical laboratory safety in academic institutions. https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/about/governance/committees/chemicalsafety/publications/acs-safety-guidelines-academic.pdf
American Chemical Society. (2016b). Safety in academic chemistry laboratories. https://www.acs.org/content/dam/pldp/center/lab-safety/publications/safety-in-academic-chemistry-laboratories-students.pdf
Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., Root, D., Rudder, L., Xanthoudaki, M., & Yoon, S. (2010). Making science matter: Collaborations between informal science education organizations and schools. CAISE: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education.
Bozdoğan, A. E. (2008). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilim merkezlerini fen öğretimi açısından değerlendirmesi: Feza Gürsey Bilim Merkezi örneği. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 19-41. (In Turkish)
Can, N., Germi, N., Güneş, M. H., & Şener, N. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde laboratuvar kullanımına yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci değerlendirmeleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (20), 1-11. (In Turkish)
Carchman, E. (2019). Effective time management strategies for conducting laboratory research. In G. Kennedy, A. Gosain, M. Kibbe & S. LeMaire (Eds.), Success in academic surgery: Basic science (pp. 21-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14644-3_3
Çepni, S., Kaya, A., & Küçük, M. (2005). Fizik öğretmenlerinin laboratuvarlara yönelik hizmet içi ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 3(2), 181-196. (In Turkish)
Çığrık, E., & Özkan, M. (2016). Bilim merkezinin fen bilimleri dersine yönelik tutuma ve öğrenme kalıcılığına etkisi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 45(209), 124-143. (In Turkish)
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Cornell University. (2024). Laboratory emergency shutdown procedures. https://ehs.cornell.edu/research-safety/chemical-safety/laboratory-safety-manual/chapter-5-emergency-preparation/53-0
Coşkun, M. (2017). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının laboratuvar güvenliği hakkındaki bilgi düzeyleri (Master’s thesis, Gazi University). (In Turkish)
Coştu, B., Ayas, A., Çalık, M., Ünal, S., & Karataş, F. O. (2005). Fen öğretmen adaylarının çözelti hazırlama ve laboratuvar malzemelerini kullanma yeterliliklerinin belirlenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2005), 65-72. (In Turkish)
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma tasarımı: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. (In Turkish)
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Sage Publications.
Harvard University. (2024). Lab emergency response guide. https://www.ehs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/lab_emergency_response_guide_0.pdf
Heper, S. (2023). Türkiye'deki bilim merkezleri ve bilim merkezleri için işletme modeli önerisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.33537/sobild.2022.14.1.12 (In Turkish)
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Houston University. (2024). Laboratory emergency preparedness. https://www.uh.edu/ehs/commons/planning/laboratory-emergency-preparedness/
Hülagü, K. T. (2018). Bilim merkezlerine düzenek seçimi için çok ölçütlü bir model önerisi (Doctoral dissertation, Kocaeli University). (In Turkish)
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn and Bacon.
Karadeniz, C. (2009). Dünya’daki çocuk müzeleri ile bilim, teknoloji ve keşif merkezlerinin incelenmesi ve Türkiye için bir çocuk müzesi modeli oluşturulması (Master’s thesis, Ankara university). (In Turkish)
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Keskin Geçer, A. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin laboratuvar uygulamaları ile ilgili yeterlilikleri, tutumları ve karşılaşılan problemler (Doctoral dissertation, Fırat University). (In Turkish)
Kırpık, M. A., & Engin, A. O. (2009). Fen bilimlerinin öğretiminde laboratuvarın yeri önemi ve biyoloji öğretimi ile ilgili temel sorunlar. Kafkas Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 61-72. (In Turkish)
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Ministry of National Education. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf (In Turkish)
Minnesota University. (2024). Emergency procedures. https://healthemergencyresponse.umn.edu/emergency-response/emergency-procedures/emergency-procedures-0
National Research Council. (2011). Prudent practices in the laboratory: Handling and management of chemical hazards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12654
OSHA. (2011). Laboratory safety guidance. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3404laboratory-safety-guidance.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Pilo, M., Mantero, A., & Marasco, A. (2011). Science centers: A resource for school and community. US-China Education Review, 8(1), 80-88.
Quistgaard, N., & Højland, A. K. (2010). New and innovative exhibition concepts at science centres using communication technologies. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(4), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2010.525408
Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88(S1), S4-S16. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20017
Richmond, J. Y., & Nesby-O'Dell, S. L. (2002). Laboratory security and emergency response guidance for laboratories working with select agents. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 51(RR19), 1-8.
Sawyer, R. K. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049900500402
Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2303-2323. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00111C
Şimşek, N., & Çınar, Y. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji laboratuvarı ve uygulamaları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. (In Turkish)
Singer, S. R. (2013). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. National Academies Press.
Singer, S. R., Hilton, M. L., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11311
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.429
Sözer, Y., & Oral, B. (2016). Sınıf içi öğrenmeleri destekleyen okul dışı aktif öğrenme süreci: Bir meta-sentez çalışması. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 7(22), 278-310. (In Turkish)
Tal, T., Lavie Alon, N., & Morag, O. (2014). Exemplary practices in field trips to natural environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(4), 430-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21137
Tekbıyık, A., & Ercan, O. (2015). Effects of the physical laboratory versus the virtual laboratory in teaching simple electric circuits on conceptual achievement and attitudes towards the subject. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(3), 77-89.
Toplis, R., & Allen, M. (2012). ‘I do and I understand?’ Practical work and laboratory use in United Kingdom schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.812a
Tran, L. U., & King, H. (2011). Teaching science in informal environments: Pedagogical knowledge for informal educators. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 279-293). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_16
TÜBİTAK Science and Technology. (2024). Bilim merkezleri. https://bilimteknik.tubitak.gov.tr/system/files/makale/bilim_merkezleri.pdf (In Turkish)
TÜBİTAK Science Centers. (2024). Retrieved Nov 05, 2025, from https://bilimmerkezleri.tubitak.gov.tr/ (In Turkish)
TÜBİTAK. (2022). TÜBİTAK 2022 yılı faaliyet raporu. https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/2023-09/tubitak_2022_yili_faaliyet_raporu_1.pdf (In Turkish)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). Management of hazardous waste pharmaceuticals. https://www.epa.gov/hwgenerators/management-hazardous-waste-pharmaceuticals
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Yalın, H. İ. (2001). Hizmet içi eğitim programlarının değerlendirilmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 150(3), 58-68. (In Turkish)
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık. (In Turkish)
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4rd Ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cansu Aydın Emektar, Havva Yamak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
