Contextualizing Leadership: How Does National Societal Culture Shape the Practices of School Leadership in Türkiye?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29329/bes.2023.563.05Keywords:
National culture, School leadership, The field of educational leadership and management, TürkiyeAbstract
The dominating knowledge base in EDLM (educational leadership and management) comes from developed Western countries (Anglo-Sakson, English-speaking countries). Naturally, the accumulated knowledge reflects insights from these countries whose education systems are mostly structured in a decentralized and non-hierarchical fashion. Particularly with the flux of globalization, the developing nations felt more comfortable in borrowing this knowledge from the developed world to inform practice and to frame research, depending on the basic assumption that the theories and practices that originated in one culture continue to be valid in the target culture. However, some scholars caution that borrowing policies or practices from elsewhere might not bring about desired effects unless those in charge of improving school effectiveness do not consider the cultural factors influential on the implementation process (Dimmock & Walker, 2000; Hallinger & Leithwood, 1996; Harris & Jones, 2018). Therefore, recent years have witnessed growing research efforts from EDLM scholars around the world to illuminate the effects of societal culture on school leadership practices. They accepted the challenge to incorporate cultural lenses into their empirical inquiries (e.g., Shengnan & Hallinger, 2021; Truong et al., 2017; Walker et al., 2012). However, there is a lack of research focusing on educational leadership practices from a societal and cultural perspective in Türkiye. This study focuses attention explicitly on illuminating how national culture might shape the current practices of school leadership in Türkiye. This chapter is divided into several sections. To begin with, we have provided information on Türkiye in general and about the education system in particular. Then we described what societal culture is and how the available literature on societal culture might describe Turkish societal culture. Finally, we discuss the practices of school leaders and link them to the Turkish societal culture.
References
Akyüz, Y. (2013). Türk eğitim tarihi; M.Ö. 1000 – M.S. 2013. Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)
Albayrak, M. (2010). Kemalism and the historical formation of the intellectual foundations. Journal of Atatürk Research Center, 26(77), 307–342.
Altuncu, Y., Aktepe, Ş. Ö., & İslamoğlu, G. (2012). Preliminary study for the development of uncertainty avoidance instrument in Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 1(4), 34–48.
Aslanargun, E., & Tarku, E. (2014). Teachers’ expectations about supervision and guidance roles of supervisors. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 20(3), 281–306.
Balcı, A. (2008). Türkiye’de eğitim yönetiminin bilimleşme düzeyi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 14(2), 181–209. (In Turkish)
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121.
Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2015). Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of efforts by principals to improve teaching and learning in Turkish middle schools. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1471–1485. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0009
Beycioğlu, K., Şahin, I., & Kesik, F. (2018). Analysis of maladministration of selection and assignment of school principals in Turkey: A critical perspective. In E. Samier & P. Milley (Eds.), International perspectives on maladministration in education (pp. 137–150). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150222-10
Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2003). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama. Pegem A Yayınları. (In Turkish)
Çalışkan, E. (2019). Sunni political culture and its effects on the Turkish state tradition. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(10), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.29228/k7auifd.10.1
Carl, D., Gupta, V., & Javidan, M. (2004). Power distance. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations (pp. 513-559). The GLOBE Study.
Dağli, A., & Ağalday, B. (2018). Okul müdürlerinin paternalist liderlik davranışlarının incelenmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(66), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.341663 (In Turkish)
Demirel, M. (2002). Türk eğitiminin modernleşmesinde rüşdiye mektepleri. Türkler, XV, 44-60. (In Turkish)
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000). Globalisation and societal culture: Redefining schooling and school leadership in the twenty-first century. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 30(3), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/713657474
Doğan, S. (2010). Öğretmen ve yönetici görüşlerine göre ilköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin liderlik stilleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 101–123. (In Turkish)
Faghfoory, M. H. (2014). Shi’ite İslam. In G. M. Reichberg & H. Syse (Eds.), Religion, war, and ethics. A sourcebook of textual traditions (pp. 389–470). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979651
Farrukh, M., Lee, J. W. C., Sajid, M., & Waheed, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial intentions: The role of individualism and collectivism in perspective of theory of planned behaviour. Education and Training, 61(7/8), 984–1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09-2018-0194
Fikret-Pasa, S., Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. (2001). Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology, 50(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00073
Gelişli, Y. (2002). Osmanlı ilköğretim kurumlarından Sıbyan mektepleri (Kuruluşu, gelişimi ve dönüşümü). Türkler, XV, 35–43. (In Turkish)
Godwyn, M., & Gittell, J. H. (2011). Sociology of organizations: Structures and relationships. Sage.
Gündüz, M. (2010). Osmanlı mirası cumhuriyetin inşası: Modernleşme, eğitim, kültür ve aydınlar. Lotus Yayınevi. (In Turkish)
Gündüz, M. (2018). Militarising school: Militarism in the Turkish educational system (1926–1947). Paedagogica Historica, 54(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2017.1296474
Gürbüz, R., Erdem, E., & Yıldırım, K. (2013). Başarılı okul müdürlerinin özellikleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2013), 167–179. (In Turkish)
Güven, İ. (2015). Türk eğitim tarihi. Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)
Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239610148296
Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243032000112801
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Why context matters: A comparative perspective on education reform and policy implementation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9231-9
Helvacı, M. A., & Aydoğan, İ. (2011). Etkili okul ve etkili okul müdürüne ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 41–60. (In Turkish)
Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1-2), 46–74.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hofstede, G. H. (1997). Culture and organization: Software of the mind. McGraw Hill.
House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2001). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 310.
İlhan, Ü. D., & Yemişci, D. A. (2020). Ulusal kültür, örgüt kültürü ve iş güvenliği kültürü ilişkisi: Hofstede’nin güç mesafesi ve belirsizlikten kaçinma boyutlari açisindan Türkiye özelinde bir değerlendirme. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(3), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.758132 (In Turkish)
Javidan, M., & Dastmalchian, A. (2009). Managerial implications of the GLOBE project: A study of 62 societies. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411108099289
Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. (1998). Leadership, values and institutions: The case of Turkey. Western Academy of Management Conference, İstanbul.
Kabasakal, H., & Dastmalchian, A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on leadership and culture in the Middle East. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00069
Kalaycı, E. (2019). Oğuz Kağan destanında Türklerin lider anlayışı üzerine bazı tespitler. Rumelide Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14, 198-214. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.541012 (In Turkish)
Kaya, Y. K. (2015). İnsan yetiştirme düzenimiz. Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)
Kodaman, B. (2007). Osmanlı Devleti’nin yükseliş ve çöküş sebeplerine genel bakış. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, 1–24. (In Turkish)
Köksal, O. (2011). Bir kültürel liderlik paradoksu: Paternalizm. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 101–122. (In Turkish)
Merçil, E. (1997). Müslüman-Türk devletleri tarihi. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. (In Turkish)
MoNE. (2005). Basic education in Turkey-background report. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/39642601.pdf
MoNE. (2018). Turkey’s 2023 Education Vision. https://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf (In Turkish)
MoNE. (2020). National education statistics formal education 2018/'19. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_09/30102730_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2018_2019.pdf (In Turkish)
OECD. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/43023606.pdf
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do. Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Volume I, Revised Edition, February 2014). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-I.pdf
OECD. (2014b). TALIS 2013 Results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en
OECD. (2019). Results from TALIS 2018. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS2018_CN_TUR.pdf
Özdemir, M. (2016) Kültürel farklılıklar ve liderlik. In N. Güçlü & S. Koşar (Eds.), Eğitim yönetiminde liderlik: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama (pp. 353-377). Pegem Akademi. (In Turkish)
Özdemir, M. (2018). Eğitim yönetimi: Alanın temelleri ve çağdaş yönelimler. Anı. (In Turkish)
Ozdemir-Sarigil, B., & Sarigil, Z. (2021). Who is patriarchal? The correlates of patriarchy in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 26(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2021.1924986
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024007005
Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896042
Şimşek, H. (2004). Eğitim yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesi: Karşılaştırmalı örnekler ve Türkiye için öneriler. Çağdaş Egitim Dergisi, 29(307), 13–21. (In Turkish)
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
Truong, T. D., Hallinger, P., & Sanga, K. (2017). Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam: Exploring the influence of culture on principal decision making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215607877
Turan, S. (2000). John Dewey’s report of 1924 and his recommendations on the Turkish educational system revisited. History of Education, 29(6), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600050163174
Ülken, H. Z. (1961). İslamda akademiler ve medreseler. Eğitim Hareketleri Dergisi, 78, 12–21. (In Turkish)
Walker, A., Hu, R., & Qian, H. (2012). Principal leadership in China: An initial review. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 23(4), 369–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678863
Westwood, R. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for 'paternalistic headship' among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800305
